Megaprojects are the engines of economic progress, yet their inherent scale and complexity position them on a knife-edge of risk. In today’s unforgiving capital projects landscape, early-stage missteps in technical planning and contract alignment are not minor glitches; they are latent vulnerabilities that can cascade into catastrophic cost overruns, schedule delays, and disputes downstream. For senior leaders in oil & gas, energy, and infrastructure, understanding how to de-risk these behemoths from conception to completion is not just prudent—it’s mission-critical.
The path of a megaproject is littered with familiar hazards. We routinely contend with poor scope definition, where ambiguity in early requirements translates to costly rework later. Unrealistic budgets, often based on insufficient technical maturity, set projects on a course for inevitable financial distress. Unclear risk allocation in contracts leaves critical liabilities floating, only to materialize as bitter disputes. Volatile supply chains, exposed by global disruptions, can cripple progress. And perhaps most insidious, misaligned stakeholder expectations during the crucial transition from Feasibility Study and FEED (Front-End Engineering Design) to EPC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction) execution can sow discord that unravels even the most robust plans.
Traditional EPC contract models – be they lump sum, reimbursable, or hybrid – often prove inadequate when feasibility studies and FEED phases are rushed or critically disconnected from execution realities. A lack of design maturity at the point of EPC tendering leaves too many unknowns for contractors, leading to inflated contingencies, aggressive bidding, or, worse, a deluge of change orders once physical work commences. Similarly, poor procurement planning during these formative stages exposes owners and EPC firms to late-stage cost blowouts, material shortages, and debilitating claims. The consequence is a reactive, firefighting environment where value erosion becomes the norm.
This dynamic demands a holistic EPC contract and execution strategy, one that is rigorously rooted in early-phase technical planning. It’s about front-loading intelligence and foresight. This proactive approach emphasizes:
- Rigorous Feasibility Studies: Ensuring early concepts are technically sound, economically viable, and strategically aligned before significant capital is committed.
- Clear Deliverables during FEED: Defining precisely what constitutes a mature, actionable FEED package to minimize ambiguities before EPC.
- Robust DED (Detailed Engineering Design) Processes: Guaranteeing that the final design is constructible, optimized, and free from inter-disciplinary clashes.
This is where Athiras brings unparalleled value as an enabler of strategic clarity and execution confidence:
- Improving Owner Readiness & CAPEX Certainty: During feasibility and pre-FEED phases, our technical advisory supports owners in defining project baselines, validating technological choices, and developing strategic cost estimates that accurately reflect capital expenditure (CAPEX) certainty, minimizing early surprises.
- Supporting Risk-Informed FEED Packages: Our experts work alongside owner’s engineers and FEED consultants to enrich FEED packages with strategic cost estimates, meticulous interface mapping, and comprehensive value engineering. This ensures that technical decisions are risk-informed, anticipating and mitigating potential issues before the EPC tender.
- Delivering High-Integrity DED Packages: We assist in the development of robust, constructible, and optimized DED packages that significantly de-risk subsequent tendering and contract execution. This precision in design minimizes the basis for change orders and claims, upholding the highest standards of engineering integrity.
The true resilience of an EPC contract is built long before the ground is broken. It is forged through execution tactics meticulously applied from the FEED and DED stages:
- Structured Risk Registers: Developed early and actively managed, our advisory services ensure these registers are dynamic, living documents, integrating insights from technical studies to identify latent risks, assign clear ownership, and define proactive mitigation strategies.
- Contract Alignment Workshops: We facilitate collaborative workshops during FEED and DED to ensure all stakeholders—owner, FEED engineer, and prospective EPC entities—achieve a shared understanding of project scope, risks, and performance expectations, establishing a foundation for trust and transparency.
- Milestone-Based Payment Strategies: Our technical advisors help craft payment milestones directly linked to tangible design maturity and procurement achievements, providing clear incentives for early technical completion and precise progress visibility, informed by digital insights into project performance.
- Contingency Modeling: We work with project teams to develop sophisticated contingency models that are rooted in robust technical risk assessments from FEED, allowing for data-driven allocation of contingency buffers where they are most needed, rather than arbitrary percentages. By embedding these practices early, Athiras’s advisory services empower projects to prevent costly firefighting and claims later in the cycle.
Consider a recent hypothetical scenario: a major LNG terminal expansion, where the initial FEED package, due to schedule pressures, left several critical interface details ambiguous regarding tie-ins to existing facilities. This lack of clarity presented a latent risk for the eventual EPC contractor. Early engagement with Athiras as a technical advisor during the pre-tender phase enabled us to conduct an independent review of the FEED package. Our detailed interface mapping and constructability workshops, leveraging our deep experience in brownfield projects, uncovered a potential multi-million-dollar design rework and schedule delay that would have materialized post-EPC award due to conflicting pipe routing and structural supports. Our proactive identification and proposed resolutions allowed the owner to issue clarifications and incorporate these into the EPC tender, validating constructability assumptions and preventing what could have been a catastrophic claim and delay once the project hit the ground.
Looking ahead, capital project leaders must prioritize a fundamental mindset shift in the next decade. We must champion design maturity as a key performance indicator for project readiness, not just a phase to rush through. Digital cost control must evolve beyond simple tracking to predictive analytics that inform strategic decision-making. Risk-driven FEED will become the norm, with every technical decision weighed against its impact on overall project risk. Finally, truly collaborative contracting will emerge as the dominant paradigm, fostering an ecosystem of shared success. Partners like Athiras are critical enablers of this transformation, providing the technical foresight, strategic clarity, and execution confidence required to future-proof megaprojects against an increasingly complex future.
What early-stage strategies are you leveraging to de-risk your next capital project? Share your thoughts below!
Contact our experts today to discuss your project’s unique requirements and build your success from the ground up.
contact@athiras.id | www.athiras.id